|
Appeal to Prime
Minister Naoto Kan (September 4, 2010)
We Implore Prime Minister Naoto Kan to Retract the
August 31 Bilateral Experts Study Group Report
and May 28 Japan-US Joint Statement on Futenma Replacement Facility
Association
to Protect the Northernmost Dugong
Representative:
Masako Suzuki
n-hokugen.19@kjd.biglobe.ne.jp
September
4, 2010
On
August 31st,the Kan administration released the “Futenma Replacement
Facility Bilateral Experts Study Group Report” (ExSG Report). We, the
Association to Protect the Northernmost Dugong, deplore most vehemently the
release of this Report which should never have been written.
We strongly agree with the editorial carried by the Okinawa Times,
Sept. 2, severely criticizing the government for releasing the Report which
includes designs for the new US military facilities. The editorial points out
that the ExSG Report was prepared without consulting the local people and
conceals the flight zones.
During the campaign for the 2009 election which swept the Democrats to
power, the former Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama promised to move the US Marine
Corps Air Station Futenma, “at least, out of the Okinawa Prefecture”. He soon
betrayed the nation, especially the Okinawans, and broke this promise on the
grounds of the base’s military deterrent value. The May 28 US-Japan Security
Consultative Committee (SCC) Joint Statement on Futenma Replacement Facility,
issued shortly before Hatoyama’s resignation, blatantly ignored the expressed
will of the Okinawan people. For the Okinawan people the SCC Joint Statement is
nothing more than the restatement of the 1872~1879 military annexation of the
Ryukyu Kingdom (i.e. Okinawa) by the Meiji government known as the ‘Ryukyu
Shobun’ [1].
The Okinawan people, therefore, strongly demand the retraction of the SCC Joint
Statement. However, immediately after succeeding Hatoyama, Prime Minister Naoto
Kan promised President Barrack Obama to faithfully carry out the articles of
the SCC Joint Statement and the ExSG Report was prepared in accordance with
it.
This illegitimate Report attempts to conceal plans to deploy the MV 22
Osprey VTOL aircraft at the Henoko facility which the US government has already
admitted. It leaves out the details of the flight zones, in an attempt to hide
the gravity of noise pollution and risk to life for residents nearby. It also
fails to mention the Japanese government’s demand to the ExSG for a permanent
base for its own Self Defense Forces within the planned Henoko base.
We, as a Nature Conservation Group having been working for a long time
to protect the critically endangered northernmost dugong (Japan Red List IA)
from extinction, cannot but shudder reading the Report which clearly states
that the new base will be built by landfilling the waters off Henoko Cape.
The ExSG Report and the attached figures show that both the V- and I-
shaped runway plans for the new base will occupy parts of Oura Bay, the Henoko
shore and Henoko Cape between them. These
waters are exactly the areas richest in seagrass, the dugong’s only food. Burying these areas would
annihilate the northernmost dugong. Concerning the “V”-plan, the ExSG Report
blithely states , “The existing beach on the east side of Camp Schwab would be
lost due to reclamation, resulting in the loss of some animal and plant
habitat.” We can never allow this “reclamation” which, by dumping an enormous
amount of dirt into the sea, would destroy the delicate web of the marine
ecosystem.
The landfill required by either plan would not only annihilate the
marine life of the buried areas but would also cause wider scale destruction.
Alteration of sea currents will change the natural process of buildup and
erosion of the sand in the bays, affecting the vegetation, the corals and the
ecosystem as a whole. As has long been noted out, collection and transporting
the landfill material too would be gravely detrimental to the environment.
Furthermore, if the new facility began to operate the effluent from the
residential drainage and the detergent used to desalinate the aircraft would
further pollute the waters.
Even now, new species are being discovered in this treasury of
bio-diversity, Oura Bay, which would be forever lost with the building of the
new base. A large area of coral off the Henoko beach would also be destroyed
along with its inhabitants, depriving the local community of its livelifood:
its fisheries and other marine resources.
Inside Camp Schwab a control facility and other buildings to be used by
the new base are already under construction while sturdy boundary walls are
planned to separate the Camp from outside. The well-loved scenery of Henoko
Cape, the islands of Naga-shima and Hira-jima would be lost. The obstinate
determination of the US and the Japanese governments to build, at all cost, the
new base in Henoko is blindingly obvious.
Nevertheless, we shall continue our field study of dugong ecology
and look for ways to keep the population from extinction. We shall be firm in
our opposition to the new base in Henoko so that the Okinawan ecosystem would
be conserved and the local community may continue to be blessed with riches of
Nature.
We
insist that the Prime Minister Naoto Kan and his government must abandon the
ExSG Report and retract the May 28 SCC Joint Statement. The solution to the ‘Futenma
Problem’ should not be made by merely relocating the ‘most dangerous runway in
the world’ but by, as the citizens of the Ginowan request, an immediate closure
and reversion of the Air Station to Okinawa.
Appeal to Prime
Minister Yukio Hatoyama (April 30, 2010)
To Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama
Dear Sir,
More than 90,000 people from Okinawa and other parts of Japan attended
the rally, at Yomitanson, Okinawa, on April 25, to oppose the relocation of the
US Marine Corps Futenma Air-station to any place inside the Okinawa Prefecture.
The rally was a clear expression of the consensus of the Okinawan people. Mr.
Prime Minister, you said that the opinion expressed by the rally was a “part of
the people’s will”. Are you going to take this “part of the people’s will”
seriously? Your cabinet action seems to
be trampling upon the consensus of the Okinawan people.
On
April 26, the day after the rally, the working-level talks on Foreign and
Defense affairs, which had been adjourned, were resumed in Washington DC. Mr. Campbell, Deputy Assistant Secretary of
State commented that he was encouraged by the new Japanese proposal concerning
the Futenma problem. He made clear that his government is resolute on solving
the problem based upon the 2006 bilateral agreement pressing the relocation
site on Henoko. Mr. Campbell was ‘encouraged’ since you are now trying to
relieve yourself from the no-win situation by abandoning an attempt to find a
relocation site outside Okinawa Prefecture and aligning with his side.
We,
the Association to Protect Northernmost Dugong, have been active for over ten
years since 1999 to preserve the ecosystem so that the Okinawan dugongs, a
critically endangered population, can continue to survive. We are deeply
concerned over your decision to return to a modified version of the 2006
bilateral agreement containing a plan to landfill an area off Henoko and a part
of Oura Bay, a plan destructive to the dugong’s habitat.
Mr.
Prime Minister, you have kept your ideas on solving the Futenma problem secret
until recently when you told Mr. Torao Tokuda, a former member of the House of
Representatives and influential in Tokunoshima politics, that you are
considering relocating a part of the Marines in Futenma to the Tokunoshima
Island, Kagoshima Prefecture and use the island to host some of their
exercises. You are still refusing to reveal the details of the modified version
of the 2006 agreement while planning to visit Okinawa on May 4. It is evident
that your visit is an attempt to persuade Okinawa Governor Nakaima to accept
your idea of relocating the Futenma base inside the Okinawa Prefecture.
It
is reported that you are modifying the current plan of choosing a part of the
Camp Schwab and the coast nearby as the Futenma relocation site in order to
obtain the approval of the US government. The modified plan, we hear, consists
of moving the runway further offshore than the location stated by the current
bilateral agreement; the runway would be either a pier-type airstrip supported
by piles or a ‘mega-float’ construction. We are certain that the both plans,
just as the current plan of landfilling the area off Henoko, would destroy the
ecosystem of the area. Driving thousands of piles into the seabed will destroy
the coral reef. The pier-type runway will block the sunlight necessary for
photosynthesis. The ‘mega-float’ structure consists of a large number of giant
steel pontoons upon which a runway will be constructed. It too blocks the
sunlight. In order to secure the runway, giant seawalls and a mooring system
must be constructed. This would destroy the seabed ecosystem. The seawalls
would alter the seacurrent. We have seen how the bridge connecting Katsuren
Peninsula and Henzajima Island in Kin Bay altered the seacurrents and seriously
disturbed the reef ecosystem.
Either one of the plans would put a giant lid on the sea. Both plans
kill the ocean ecosystem just as finally as the current landfill plan. They
are, as you called the landfill plan, “blasphemy against nature”. If you think,
as reported by the media, that any method other than landfill will reduce the
environmental impact you are seriously mistaken.
Destruction of the coral reef by driving thousands of piles into the
seabed, vibration and noise caused by pier-type structure or ‘mega-float’ would
drive off the remaining dugongs. The only food for dugong is a kind of
sea-grass growing in shallow water near the shore. Dugong must remain close to
the shore. Sea-grass grows by photosynthesis and so needs sunlight. Putting a
giant lid on the sea would destroy the remaining feeding place for dugong in
Okinawa.
We
are strongly opposed to your ‘modified’ plan of pressing the Futenma relocation
on the site off Henoko. The citizens of Ginowan, who have long shouldered the
burden of ‘The Most Dangerous Air-station in the World’, the Futenma
Air-station, simply want to have the Futenma Air-station closed and the land
returned immediately. The citizens of Ginowan and the Okinawan people hope to
have the Island free from the military bases. They do not want to see the base
moved from one location to another within the prefecture. Mr. Prime Minster,
your party, the Democratic Party Japan, came into power to realize sovereignty
for local communities. Doesn’t ignoring the will of the Okinawan people
directly contradict your own party platform?
Mr.
Prime Minister, your duty is not to look for a relocation site for the Futenma
Air-station; your duty is to stand firmly and demand an immediate closure and
return of the Air-station; only then may the first step for establishing an ‘equal
relationship with the US’ be realized. It is a crime to destroy the natural
environment of Okinawa by forcing a new military base upon the people and deny
their way of life which so depends on products from sea and land.
For
six years we have continued sitting-in on Henoko beach with the local people to
oppose the base construction project. Our non-violent action has prevented the
destruction of the sea where dugong lives. We remain resolute against any
attempt to build a new base off Henoko.
Mr.
Noboru Houjuyama, a former Director of Naha Defense Facility Agency, once
voiced his hope to ‘live in harmony with the US bases’. We prefer to live in
harmony with nature. Together we shall continue our effort. Let us also be
clear that we are firmly opposed to use the beautiful Tokunoshima Island or any
other place in the Ryukyu Archipelago as a Futenma relocation site or as a
place to move a part of the military exercises presently carried out in
Futenma.
April 30, 2010
Sincerely,
Association to Protect Northernmost Dugong
Representative: Masako Suzuki
n-hokugen.19@kjd.biglobe.ne.jp
Appeal to President Barack Obama
(December 10, 2009)
The
US President Barack Obama
Secretary of Defense Robert Gates
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
U.S. Ambassador to Japan John V. Roos
Association
to Protect Northernmost Dugong
Masako
Suzuki, Chairman
Miyasato
4-12-8,Nago, Okinawa, Japan
http://sea-dugong.org/
info@sea-dugong.org
December
10 ,2009
Dear Sirs,
We sincerely request your understanding of
Okinawa and Japanese people’s desire for a peaceful world and preservation of
the dugongs in Okinawa, the northernmost of the species being threatened for
extinction. For that purpose, we request you to abandon the plan to construct a
US military base at Henoko, Okinawa.
The
Association to Protect Northernmost Dugong is a NGO dedicated to preserving the
internationally protected dugong, a marine mammal of the same Sirenia order as the manatee. The most
northerly habitat of the dugong is the area around the islands of Okinawa, in
southern Japan, where a small number (estimated at a few dozen) still survive.
While
rejoicing at your country’s new administration we are nevertheless extremely
disturbed that your government is pressing ahead with plans to landfill the
magnificent, world-renowned seas of Okinawa which are home to the dugong, in
order to build a new military base off Henoko. Though even Donald Rumsfeld,
your previous Secretary of Defense, was visibly moved by this beauty when he
visited Okinawa, the plan is being forced ahead.
To
protect the dugong, the people of Okinawa joined forces with US environmental
groups and filed a case against Mr Rumsfeld and the United States Department of
Defense. The case has come to be known as “Dugong v. Rumsfeld” and is still
under way after the inauguration of the new president.
Imagine for a moment that there were a
project within the United States which would destroy the habitat of the
internationally protected manatee. How would American citizens and
environmental groups react?
When
you spoke of a nuclear-free world and peace through diplomacy, and promoted
policies appropriate for this new environmental age, you gave us concerned
citizens great hope.
However,
since the end of WW2, when Okinawa was known as the Keystone of the Pacific,
right up until the present, US bases have been concentrated in this small
island. For that reason we suffer frequently
from a variety of problems; your forces’ bombers, fighter planes and armed
helicopters have crashed, your military exercises have spread onto private
land, your noise pollution affects our daily lives and your servicemen have
committed criminal offenses outside their bases.
At
the moment a major point of friction between our countries is your Marines’
Futenma Base in the middle of Ginowan City in central Okinawa. This airfield is
extremely dangerous for the residents of the surrounding city, who have been
campaigning for its closure and return to Japanese control for many years.
Under the Mutual Security Treaty, Okinawa has long suffered the burden of the
bases and this load has already become unbearable. We fervently wish that you,
who have proudly taken responsibility for world peace, would try to understand
the suffering of Okinawa as if it were your own.
The
rich and beautiful seas where the dugongs live are the pride and strength of the
Okinawan people and the nation. The northern part of the main island, where the
planned base to replace Futenma is to be built, is the forest known as Yambaru,
which feeds the waters of the dugong’s habitat, and is home to numerous
highly-valued, endemic species. To fill in the bay, destroy the forest and
expel the residents to build, against our wishes, an airfield or helipad for
your forces, is to rob of Okinawa of its future.
In
addition, the IUCN (World Conservationist Union) has
recommended that the valuable biological environment of Okinawa, including the
dugong habitat at Henoko,
should be preserved. Maintaining the rich ecosystem of
Okinawa is our obligation to the people of the world and of the future.
In
Japan, the dugong is listed as a Natural National Monument and consequently
must be protected. If the last remaining habitat of this rare creature were to
be destroyed to build a military base, the northernmost dugong would be driven
to extinction. Undoubtedly, the people who wish to share this world with the
dugong, not only from Okinawa, Japan and America, but from around the world,
would criticize you severely. We sincerely hope you will take this to heart.
We
ask that the new administrations of Japan and the United States respond to the
will of the Okinawan people to promptly close and return to Japanese control
the airfield at Futenma, and cancel the project to build a new base in the
dugong habitat around Camp Schwab.
Mutual
trust between the people of America and Japan will not arise from our
subordinate military relationship. We are sure that this is obvious to you too.
We hope you will review the ill-considered course of our previous
administrations, take every effort for the future of the global environment and
address the target of a new US-Japan relationship from the standpoint of
conservation of the natural environment. We express out heartfelt hope that by
respecting the culture and ecosystem of Okinawa the northernmost dugong can be
saved.
yours sincerely
Masako Suzuki
Association to Protect Northernmost
Dugong
We invite your opinion!!
about more than 100 nails left on the dugong's feeding trails
The construction of a U.S. military airbase is planned at Henoko, Okinawa,
in the last remaining habitat of the critically
endangered Okinawa dugong. The Japanese
government has made promises to the US military and is pressed for time to carry out the construction. At the moment field
surveys for an "environmental impact assessment" are being carried out regardless of protests at
local and national level, despite the fact that the scope and methodology
for theassessment have not even been approved by the EIA committee.
At the end of October our group found more than 100 pegs and 8cm(3-inch)
metal nails with short nylon ropes attached,placed on the dugong’s feeding trails in their favorite feeding ground.
   
to see video, please visit the following url and click the streaming video
button
http://www.qab.co.jp/01nw/07-11-16/index4.html
Bottom sediment is sandy so that some nails have come out.We immediately
complained to the government about the irresponsible and inadequate survey,
and demanded that they remove the nails as soon as possible.
However, the officers asserted that they are
carrying out the survey with sufficient attention to dugongs. By “sufficient
attention” they meant checking the marking nails at times. The
survey will continue until next summer. The nails will remain on dugongs'
frequently-used seagrass bed for a long time.
We fear the method of the survey is very harmful for dugongs. Dugongs must be annoyed by numerous foreign
materials in seagrass and might eat the nylon ropes and nails by mistake. We want to know what you think about this issue. If the survey is likely to harm dugongs seriously, we will
call on the government to make an immediate halt to the survey. We need your advice and opinions to save Okinawa's dugongs. Thank you.
Please give us your message to info@sea-dugong.org
|
